So the problem or issue pertains to the particular range of velocities registered and transmitted by the keyboard. To clarify, the problem of some MIDI keyboards is not that the sensors reach a maximum of about 110-to-115 velocity-value, but rather that the range of velocities registered and reported by the keyboard's velocity sensors is shifted (or biased) toward higher velocities while neglecting the lower range of velocities, such that pianissimo may start at a velocity value of 30 or 35 instead of, for example, 5-15. Indeed this curve only accentuates the problem of a keyboard reaching 110 maximum. One shouldn't be needing to acquire taste when it comes to emulating a high end piano. On the other hand if you push it a little it starts to sing out and is very nice. This is strange to the ears as it gets more muffled rather than softer. It sounds like the first part of the attack is muffled in mp and more so in p & pp. But it's like the tone is half better and half worse. The Steingräber had a better dynamic balance across the registers before the update, and that hasn't changed. The dynamic difference with the melodic range around Eb3-Eb5 being piercing was difficult to compensate for. The main piano I am using is the Bechstein and I was having trouble with balancing the right and left hands. They are both more playable with balanced dynamics across the registers. Improvements on the Blüthner and Bechstein grands. Onceagain, verygrateful to u modartt, for your pioneering project. (Notentirelysatisfied with hpsi, myhumbleopinion)Īs a final remark, pianoteq really shines through careful adjustment of parameters(in PRO version)and.Ī really good(expensive!) surround(or pseudosurround) audiosystem! Maybe, ithasbeenposted already, but apart fromabrandnew concert grand(!), i expecttosee some 'improvements' in the microphones panel,Įither the GUI or the microphones(orboth)Īlso, the reallygood Ruckers harpsichord(Giusti and the others) need similar refinement-i thinkthere is room form improvement, there.įor example,release samplesnot too convincing. Many educated-'sofisticated'-deadon opinions&ideas in the forums.thankseverybody, asaresult to the passion for (serious)pianoplaying Įven so, despite of this tip, many controllers would still need at least some of the approach of this velocity curves drawing you did:Īdmittedly, when i first played pianoteq version 5.4.x or so, there were defeciences in many places.After6years, weare presented with a truly PLAYABLE pianoprogram in many aspects(that many times canbeconfused withthe real thing!) The very high velocities would be like a tail near vertical position, on graphic, while the others would look more smooth. This demand a more specific velocity curve shape on graphic, to keep the very high velocities always as the more difficult to reach. This way you can keep high dynamic of playing, even if you set pianoteq velocity graphic to a lighter response, since your controller will only send velocity midi number 127 when you play hard. You start with that and use pianoteq velocity graphic to set the velocity response to your taste. I remamber Philippe once commented about they cogitated 127 be set as the velocity where the virtual strings would broke or almost broke, as this velocity would be like simulating the limit of impact a string could hold.Ī tip I found long ago that can help, it's to set your digital piano/controller to the heaviest adjustment of playing, as this way your controller would require fast/strong playing to reach the midi velocity 127.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |